Showing posts with label Socialism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Socialism. Show all posts

Thursday, September 5, 2013

Doctors Tell Mom to Abort “Brain Dead” Baby, Mom Sues After Delivering Healthy Child

By Steven Ertelt 

(LifeNews.com) A mother in England is filing suit against a hospital where doctors told her she should have an abortion of her supposedly “brain dead” unborn baby. Sarah Hagan is now suing City Hospitals Sunderland after giving birth to a healthy child.

Hagan says that, after a 24-week ultrasound scan of her unborn baby, doctors told her that her son Aaron was “brain dead,” had just one eye and no chance of survival.

The mother of two says physicians adviser her to take an abortion drug, even though the mifepristone abortion pill is only authorized to be used to destroy the life of an unborn baby much earlier in pregnancy.

When the abortion drug didn’t work, another doctor informed Hagan her baby needed to be delivered immediately and she gave birth to Aaron, who was born at 1lb 7oz with both eyes  and healthy other than the fact that he was born prematurely — which has left him with chronic lung problems he wouldn’t have had otherwise. Now Aaron is 15 months old and Hagan is taking legal action.

Link:


Saturday, January 5, 2013

Catholic Church and Castro in cahoots to ‘eradicate’ homosexuals? MSNBC pundit’s incoherent rant

 
ROME, January 3, 2013 (LifeSiteNews.com) – Readers may be surprised to hear that Jesus Christ was the first socialist; every word of every article in the Vatican newspaper is “virtually dictated” personally by Pope Benedict; every country in Europe – indeed in the whole world – is socialist; the Catholic Church “thrives” under socialist regimes; and Fidel Castro’s mass murdering regime is on a moral par with the Catholic Church because they both allegedly want to “eradicate” homosexuals.

All of these assertions have come from the mouth of MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell, who recorded a strange and confused 3.5 minute tirade  against Pope Benedict XVI’s Christmas address, in which the pope warned that abortion and the advance of the homosexualist political and social agenda is a threat to the stability of human societies.

O’Donnell included several astonishing whoppers, including the assertion that a vow of celibacy automatically renders those who make it “tragically ignorant about marriage.” This despite the indisputable fact that the Pope, as well as nearly all clergy, are themselves the product of marriage, are surrounded like everyone else by married people and minister to married people, in addition to presumably being in possession of the normal human rational capacity that would allow them understand common cultural concepts.

Mr. O’Donnell appears not to have noticed that the Catholic Church, whose clergy have been celibate for centuries, has been administering the sacrament of marriage, counselling married people and generally been intimately involved in the institution of marriage since the founding of Christian civilization.

Another jaw-dropper was the astonishing news that Jesus Christ “was the original socialist” because he fed the poor and admonished the moneychangers in the Temple. Because apparently in Mr. O’Donnell’s odd universe, no one other than socialists have ever done any of these things.

Demonstrating his deep penetration of Vatican affairs, O’Donnell goes on to say that “everything in the Vatican newspaper [L’Osservatore Romano] is virtually dictated by the pope”. To which assertion many long-time Catholic observers of the Vatican scene will doubtless respond – after they pick themselves up off the floor – “Oh, would that it were so!”

But it is when O’Donnell equates the Catholic Church’s teaching on the meaning of human sexuality with the mass murders undertaken by Fidel Castro’s regime after his takeover of Cuba, that the Wonderland Whirl really begins. So dizzyingly bizarre are the comparisons and insinuations that it becomes difficult to sort out just what point Mr. O’Donnell is trying to make.

“The most hard-core socialist practitioner of all time was also viciously anti-gay,” says O’Donnell. Castro, “who started life as a Roman Catholic,” rounded up homosexuals “and sent them to re-education camps.”

“In Fidel Castro’s socialist utopia, gay sex was a criminal act,” O’Donnell continues. “Castro believed he could actually rid his country of all homosexuality, and he did everything in his power to achieve that.” Therefore, O’Donnell said, socialism “has not been a special friend to gay people”.

At the same time, O’Donnell claims, the Catholic Church “has thrived in socialist countries around the world,” although it “this week seems to want to pretend it is suddenly threatened by socialism”. These socialist countries, he says, include Italy. “Yes, Italy is a socialist country, as is every country in Europe, as is every country in the world, to varying degrees,” he adds.

He declined, however, to mention the countless thousands of Catholic inmates who perished in the Gulag system, prisons and torture chambers of the countries of the Soviet Union. He seems also never to have heard of any of the writings of any of the popes, largely before the 1960s, warning the world of the threat of socialistic Communism.

Untangled, O’Donnell’s message seems to be that the Catholic Church is socialist, because it follows Jesus Christ, the “first socialist,” and it is therefore exactly like Castro in its desire to persecute, torture and murder homosexuals – presumably with the approval of its socialist Founder.

Fortunately, Pope Benedict, who has been known to read a book or two now and then, was rather more coherent in his message for Christmas. However little Mr. O’Donnell may be aware of it, there is very little dispute in academia or among the more serious-minded public commentators that the “gender theory” driving the far-left, homosexualist political agenda is an offshoot of radical academic feminism, that is itself the child of Marxist theory. So much can be discovered by simply Googling the search terms “Engels, monogamous, family.”

It is hardly credible to dispute the connection of the “LGBTQ” agenda with the left, particularly in Europe where it forms a cornerstone of all the socialist, leftist and green parties’ platforms. Benedict is among the many who have personally experienced the effects of socialistic theories put into practice in various totalitarian regimes in recent European history, and is well placed to issue warnings against its re-growth under new names.

In the Christmas address that Mr. O’Donnell was at such pains to ridicule, Benedict warned that the attack on the family “goes much deeper” than was previously believed. It is a product, the pope said, ultimately of a foundational error about what it means to be human. It is a refusal to accept the very notion that there is such a thing as human nature, connected to their “bodily identity,” which we all share.

“While up to now we regarded a false understanding of the nature of human freedom as one cause of the crisis of the family, it is now becoming clear that the very notion of being – of what being human really means – is being called into question,” Pope Benedict said. Gender theory’s adherents, and the many more people they have seduced, “deny their nature and decide that it is not something previously given to them, but that they make it for themselves”.

In the gender ideology, “sex is no longer a given element of nature, that man has to accept and personally make sense of: it is a social role that we choose for ourselves, while in the past it was chosen for us by society.”

The theory denies the immutable, dual nature of humanity, that “being created by God as male and female pertains to the essence of the human creature.” But, “this duality is an essential aspect of what being human is all about,” Pope Benedict said.

“If there is no pre-ordained duality of man and woman in creation, then neither is the family any longer a reality established by creation,” he said.

“The manipulation of nature, which we deplore today where our environment is concerned, now becomes man’s fundamental choice where he himself is concerned. From now on there is only the abstract human being, who chooses for himself what his nature is to be.”

L’Osservatore Romano followed up the pope’s address with the observation that the new theory of a mutable, essentially self-determined human nature, is part and parcel of the socialist attempt to entirely re-write the nature of human beings and human societies. Lucetta Scaraffia, an eminent Italian historian who has also presumably read a few books, wrote that gender theory and its political causes are in fact the ultimate expression of Marx and Engels’ initial call for the abolition of the two-parent, biologically-based family.

She warned that the societies will “pay a high price” for the attempt to found a society on these premises, “as has already happened in the past when we have tried to achieve a complete economic and social equality.”

Pope Benedict warned, perhaps most ominously of all, that the final results of the implementation of this theory is the total objectification of human beings, particularly children. “From being a subject of rights, the child has become an object to which people have a right and which they have a right to obtain.”

Link:

Monday, September 10, 2012

SNAP: Support for Abuse Victims or Anti-Catholic Politicking?

Barbara Blaine, David Clohessy, and Fr. Thomas Doyle, O.P.

Conference speakers indicate a larger political agenda.

By David F. Pierre, Jr. 

Anyone who has watched the Catholic Church abuse narrative unfold in the media over the past several years has likely encountered SNAP, the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests, a body which bills itself as the “largest, oldest, and most active support group” for clergy abuse victims. The organization has been quite successful in building its presence and influence in the media, as journalists and writers often turn to the group when seeking a voice critical of the Church for its handling of abuse cases.

Barbara Blaine, a woman who claims to have been abused by a priest as a teenager, founded SNAP in 1988. The group convened its first meeting in 1991, and David Clohessy, a Missouri man who has also claimed abuse by a priest, joined the group in a leadership role a year later. Prior to joining SNAP, Clohessy worked for nearly a decade for the now-disgraced, radical activist group ACORN.

However, while SNAP’s stated mission is “to provide support for men and women who have been sexually victimized by members of the clergy,” the group’s leadership has allied itself with a progressive social agenda and a full-scale assault on the teaching authority of the Catholic Church.

The real agenda at play?

This past March in Washington, DC, SNAP President Blaine appeared as a featured guest at a high-voltage conference called “Women Money Power,” hosted by Feminist Majority, a very influential pro-abortion lobbying group. At the conference Blaine was joined noted activists Eleanor Smeal, Sandra Fluke, and Dawn Laguens (a vice president at Planned Parenthood) for a panel discussion titled “Bishops, Politicians, and the War on Women’s Health.”

The panelists took turns railing against Catholic leaders for their positions on “reproductive freedom” (read: contraception and abortion) and their opposition to the Obama administration’s healthcare mandate. Needless to say, the venom in the room against the Catholic Church was palpable.

Most notably, Blaine sat right next to Rev. Barry Lynn, the well-traveled president of Americans United for the Separation of Church and State whose progressive views have made him a fixture on cable television talk shows.

Blaine must have really appreciated Rev. Lynn’s talk (which can be viewed on YouTube), because just a few months later he appeared as a headline speaker at SNAP’s annual conference in Chicago. On that occasion, the energetic Lynn—a minister in the United Church of Christ—simply built upon his Church-bashing speech from the Feminist Majority conference, claiming that Catholic bishops have “no moral authority” to speak on women’s issues and human sexuality and asserting that the Church’s opposition to the Department of Health and Human Services’ contraception mandate was a “total fraud” and an “unimaginable distortion of the very idea of freedom.” According to Lynn, the Church’s objections to the HHS mandate were not really about religious liberty, but about being given “special treatment” and the “power” to impose their religious doctrine on others.

What did any of this have to do with the topic of clergy sex abuse? Why did Blaine choose Lynn to speak at her conference? They are good questions. Lynn made a brave attempt to tie the subject of clergy abuse to his talk, but ultimately the issue served as little more than a vehicle for a larger assault on the Catholic Church and advocacy for left-leaning social policies.

Child abuse is “allowed” in the Catholic Church?

Another speaker at SNAP’s Chicago conference was author Judy Braun (she has also published under the names “Judy Brown” and “Eishes Chayil,” which means “woman of valor”). In a wild presentation titled “Monotheism and Child Sacrifice,” Braun argued that Jewish communities and the Catholic Church view the sexual abuse of children as an acceptable form of child sacrifice, with roots in the biblical story of Abraham and Isaac... (continued)


Link:

Wednesday, January 25, 2012

Newt Gingrich Super PAC: Meet the Men Who Gave us ObamaCare


From Allah Pundit via Free Republic:

"Philip Klein calls it the best anti-RomneyCare ad of the cycle. I agree. And thanks to the largesse of Newt’s billionaire buddy Sheldon Adelson, this one’s going on the air in Florida with a $6 million ad buy — so huge that WaPo political blogger Aaron Blake calls it “game-changing.” In fact, despite Newt’s post-South Carolina windfall of campaign cash, it sounds like his Super PAC will be doing the heavy organizational lifting from now on..."

Monday, September 28, 2009

Andy Williams accuses Barack Obama of following Marxist theory


"Don't like him at all," he said, "I think he wants to create a socialist country. The people he associates with are very Left-wing. One is registered as a Communist.

"Obama is following Marxist theory. He's taken over the banks and the car industry. He wants the country to fail."

CommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinko
CommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinko
CommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinko
CommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinko
CommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinko
CommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinko
CommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinko
CommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinko
CommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinko
CommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinko
CommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinko
CommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinko
CommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinko
CommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinko
CommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinko
CommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinko
CommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinko
CommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinko
CommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinko
CommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinko
CommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinko
CommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinko
CommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinko
CommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinko
CommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinko
CommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinko
CommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinko
CommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinko
CommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinko
CommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinko
CommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinko
CommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinko
CommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinko
CommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinko
CommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinko
CommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinko
CommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinko
CommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinko
CommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinko
CommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinko
CommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinko
CommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinko
CommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinko
CommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinko
CommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinko
CommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinko
CommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinko
CommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinko
CommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinko
CommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinko
CommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinko
CommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinko
CommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinko
CommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinko
CommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinko
CommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinko
CommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinko
CommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinko
CommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinko
CommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinko
CommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinko
CommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinko
CommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinko
CommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinko
CommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinko
CommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinkoCommieMarxistPinko